Survival of the sickest‬ - Sharon Moalem - Review


Running into 8 chapters, the first 3 were very attractive. This should make a good reading both for the beginners and non-science readers. Written in a very simple language the book lacks references or foot notes then and there. A few notes are given at the end of the book, but if that was provided in-situ, the readability would have been enhanced.
Some chapters in the end describe what we call "junk science". The junk science is the 'projected-out' views during the course of a research and at times it would mark serendipity as well. Those events that come in the 'context' of a topic cannot be taken to describe the whole. For instance, diabetes that describes increased incidence of sugar in a human is marked 'favourable' for persons living in cold regions for obvious reasons. A person in cold regions needs to burn more sugar to keep himself warm. But this cannot be substituted as 'evolution' phenomenon in the present context where many in tropical region have acquired this as a result of life-style.
Likewise, the author predicts flaw in evolution, which is not agreeable scientifically. The Evolution theory is still debatable and science has not concretely proved it. That warrants no discussion on a topic related to it. The author attributes 'gender' based on evolution and not on more obvious reasons like 'natural selection' and hormones.
On microbes, the writings are interesting, but I felt a negative approach in describing their existance and functionality. Here is what one can summarize on the book:
Ch.1. Ironing it out
Hemochromatosis is an inherited disease in which the body continues to load up on iron because the mechanism regulating iron has broken down. The suggestion is that natural selection is maintaining this genetic defect because it had conferred some benefit in the past.
The long held tradition of bloodletting to fight disease may therefore have had a good basis in fact after all. Starving infectious bacteria of iron by reducing the amount of blood is the surprising benefit that might explain why people believed in the value of bloodletting for so long.
Ch. 2. A spoonful of sugar helps the temperature go down
Diabetes is a disease where the body fails to remove excess sugar from the bloodstream. Dr. Moalem suggests that excess sugar in the blood could have been selected for in the past because sugar could act like antifreeze in times of extreme cold. Now this is not justifiable in the present day scenario.
Ch. 3. The cholesterol also rises
This chapter mentions about Vitamin D and its tremendous benefit in preventing many diseases, not just rickets. There is enough Vitamin D added to milk to prevent rickets. Those living in northern latitudes are at a disadvantage because several minutes of directly overhead sunshine is what is needed to convert cholesterol in our bodies into enough Vitamin D to have an effect. Taking Vitamin D supplements is also an option, as is an ultraviolet B tanning salon or eating fatty fish as the Inuit do.
While the sun makes Vitamin D, it unfortunately destroys folic acid. Skin colour is the adaptation that balances out the effect of the sun. People with dark skin can protect themselves from folic acid depletion, but they need to carry higher amounts of cholesterol to maximize whatever sunlight gets through the skin.
Surprisingly the author asks us to avoid sunglasses while sunbathing. The pituitary gland is involved in helping produce melanin, which darkens the skin. If the pituitary gland does not get signal from the optic nerve (while wearing sunglasses) then the body will not get the right signal about the direct sunlight.
Ch. 4. Hey, bud, can you do me a fava?
Many plants produce toxins to protect themselves from predators. People with favism cannot clear out the free radicals produced by fava beans because of a genetic deficiency. The free radicals attack red blood cells. It turns out that people with this genetic deficiency end up being more resistant to malaria. Does not sound well with the present day scenario on this disease.
Ch. 5. Of microbes and men
The rod of Asclepius — a symbol depicting removal of the Guinea worm parasite is mentioned here. The chapter makes an interesting reading with microbes such as T.Gondii in cats, D. dentriticum in sheep, H. argyraphaga in spider and common sneezing virus bringing out some spine chilling facts. This section has no references for all the incidents mentioned.
Ch. 6. Jump into the gene pool
Large portions of our junk DNA (DNA that does not code for proteins) are made of jumping genes. Empty space? Retroviruses are made of RNA, and can be written into DNA. HIV is a retrovirus, and the drug “cocktail” therapy used to combat HIV
is aimed at stopping the enzyme that helps the retroviruses become part of DNA.
Ch. 7. Methyl madness : road to the final phenotype
Epigenetics is a whole new field in genetics that is concerned with the study of how children can inherit and express new traits derived from their parents without changes in the underlying DNA. This chapter has more of author's views than science and hence one can lose interest given the way exaggerations are made out of the mutations and telomers.
Ch. 8. That’s life : why you and your iPod must die
Again I would disagree with the author on the theory that is put forth in this chapter. That every cell is programmed for a certain number of multiplications (Hayflack limit) and hence death should come only when this limit is reached, does not hold good in a 'thermodynamic' world where everything is dependent on one's life style, environment and food. That would mean every person should live at least 60 years compulsorily!
Points in favour of the aquatic ape theory that are not strong enough:
– humans are the only land animals with fat attached to our skin (like hippos, sea lions, and whales)
– the ability to survive in both land and water environments has tremendous survival benefits against predators
– walking upright helps in venturing into deeper water and so this is how bipedalism may have come about
– we may have lost our fur so as to become more streamlined in the water
– we have downward-facing nostrils, which allowed us to dive
– the extra fat in babies help keeps them afloat
– newborns don’t start breathing until they feel air on their face, which makes birthing in water very safe, and actually easier on
the mother
– newborns reflexively hold their breath, but they also make rhythmic movements that propel them through the water (a behaviour which lasts about four months)–this makes more sense in the aquatic ape theory than in the Savannah theory

How chameleons change their colour?


With a little help from Raman spectroscopy, Swiss scientists have found the answer to an endlessly intriguing evolutionary poser. 

It turns out that chameleons have a mobile “lattice” of#nanocrystals on the surface of their skin, which come together, change shape and disperse thereby shifting the wavelength of light reflected by the reptile.

Scientists studied the panther chameleon Furcifer pardalis from Madagascar, known for its particularly dynamic colour changing abilities — going from green to red within minutes — especially during social interactions such as courtship or male-male combat. These #nanocrystals — of different shapes, sizes and organizations — are distributed in two layers of skin cells called #iridophores (iridescent light-reflecting cells). While the upper layer of iridophores is responsible for rapid colour change achieved by a shift in spacing of nanocrystals in a triangular lattice, the deeper layer of cells broadly reflects light, especially in the near-infrared range, the scientists report in Nature Communications.

The distance between crystals is on average 30 per cent less in the resting state (blue or green skin) than it is in the excited state (yellow or white). With an increase in distance between nanocrystals in excited male panther chameleons, iridophores shift their selective reflectivity from short (blue) to long (red or infrared) wavelengths, causing the corresponding shift from green to yellow/orange skin, says the paper.

Chameleons originated in post-Gondwanan Africa around 90 million years ago. The way these iridophores are organised allows some species “to combine efficient camouflage with spectacular display,” while also potentially providing passive thermal protection.

Read more about this here: http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2015/150302/ncomms7368/full/ncomms7368.html

‪‎Physics of the Impossible by Michio Kaku - ‪Review


The "impossibilities" in Physical Life have been narrated well with skirmishing incidents of the Bohr-Einstein-Schrodinger era debates that are found written in many books. But Michio Kaku takes the reader beautifully into some impossibilities predicted by Physics which could become possible in the years to come (I am yet to read his book "Physics of the Future"). Occasionally a few pages are very
interesting, nevertheless, the reader is never distracted. Quotes from Bohr, Pauli, Sagan and others are very interesting. The analysis about symmetry on which physics is now based and the nature's laws connected with predators and preys are very reasonable. The prey is always faster than the predator!
A few classifications are significant:
"Class 1 Impossibilities: These are technologies that are impossible today but that do not violate the known laws of physics. So they might be possible in this century, or perhaps the next. They include teleportation, anti-matter engines, certain forms of telepathy, psycho kinesis, and invisibility.
“Class 2 Impossibilities: These are technologies that sit at the very edge of our understanding of the physical world. If they are possible at all, they might be realized on a scale of millennia to millions of years. They include time machines, the possibility of hyperspace travel, and travel through wormholes.”
“Class 3 impossibilities: These are technologies that violate the known laws of
physics. Surprisingly, there are vary few such technologies. If they do turn
out to be possible they would represent a fundamental shift in our understanding of physics.”
And the Civilizations that would bother these:
Type 1 civilization: Those that harvest planetary power, utilizing all the sunlight that strikes their planet. They can, perhaps, harness the power of volcanoes, manipulate the weather, control earthquakes, and build cities on the oceans. All planetary power is with in their control.
Type 2 civilization: Those that can utilize the total power of their sun, making them 10 billion times more powerful then a type 1 civilization. A type 2 civilization in a sense, is immortal; nothing known to science, such as ice ages, meteor impacts, or even supernovae, can destroy it.
Type 3 civilization: Those that can utilize the power of an entire galaxy. They are 10 billion times more powerful then a type 2 civilization. The Borg in Star Trek, the Empire in Star Wars, and the galactic civilization in Asimov’s Foundation series correspond to a type 3 civilization. They have colonized entire star systems and can exploit the black hole at the center of their galaxy. They freely roam the galaxy.
This apart, his views on Ramjet, Telepathy, Force Fields,Invisibility, Energy Weapons, Teleportation, Psychokinesis, Robots, UFOs & Aliens,Space Travel (including Faster Than Light travel & Particle) Parallel & Alternate Universes, Time Travel, Perpetual Motion Machines, Precognition, Parallel Universe and perpetual motion, make the book very interesting one.
The ‪#‎Quantum‬ era incidents including the Dirac's ignorance to patent his equation on ‪#‎Relativity‬ theory, because of which gadgets exist in our hands, truly refresh our sense of inclination towards Physics, in particular and Science, in general.
That the entire Universe/Multiverse has dark energy to about 73%, with the energy by humans amounting to only about 0.03% is truly astonishing (while computing zero point energy) and shows the long way one has to cover to understand the Creator.

Valences of the Elements

Chemistry of the Periodic Table
Many people believe that the valences of the elements are those which can be derived by looking at the Groups (columns) of the Periodic Table. It is true that these are the most common valences, but the real behavior of electrons is less simple. Here is a listing of element valences. Remember that an element's electron cloud will become more stable by filling, emptying, or half-filling the shell. Also, shells don't stack neatly one on top of another, so don't always assume an element's valence is determined by the number of electrons in its outer shell.
NumberElementValence
1Hydrogen(-1), +1
2Helium0
3Lithium+1
4Beryllium+2
5Boron-3, +3
6Carbon(+2), +4
7Nitrogen-3, -2, -1, (+1), +2, +3, +4, +5
8Oxygen-2
9Fluorine-1, (+1)
10Neon0
11Sodium+1
12Magnesium+2
13Aluminum+3
14Silicon-4, (+2), +4
15Phosphorus-3, +1, +3, +5
16Sulfur-2, +2, +4, +6
17Chlorine-1, +1, (+2), +3, (+4), +5, +7
18Argon0
19Potassium+1
20Calcium+2
21Scandium+3
22Titanium+2, +3, +4
23Vanadium+2, +3, +4, +5
24Chromium+2, +3, +6
25Manganese+2, (+3), +4, (+6), +7
26Iron+2, +3, (+4), (+6)
27Cobalt+2, +3, (+4)
28Nickel(+1), +2, (+3), (+4)
29Copper+1, +2, (+3)
30Zinc+2
31Gallium(+2). +3
32Germanium-4, +2, +4
33Arsenic-3, (+2), +3, +5
34Selenium-2, (+2), +4, +6
35Bromine-1, +1, (+3), (+4), +5
36Krypton0
37Rubidium+1
38Strontium+2
39Yttrium+3
40Zirconium(+2), (+3), +4
41Niobium(+2), +3, (+4), +5
42Molybdenum(+2), +3, (+4), (+5), +6
43Technetium+6
44Ruthenium(+2), +3, +4, (+6), (+7), +8
45Rhodium(+2), (+3), +4, (+6)
46Palladium+2, +4, (+6)
47Silver+1, (+2), (+3)
48Cadmium(+1), +2
49Indium(+1), (+2), +3
50Tin+2, +4
51Antimony-3, +3, (+4), +5
52Tellurium-2, (+2), +4, +6
53Iodine-1, +1, (+3), (+4), +5, +7
54Xenon0
55Cesium+1
56Barium+2
57Lanthanum+3
58Cerium+3, +4
59Praseodymium+3
60Neodymium+3, +4
61Promethium+3
62Samarium(+2), +3
63Europium(+2), +3
64Gadolinium+3
65Terbium+3, +4
66Dysprosium+3
67Holmium+3
68Erbium+3
69Thulium(+2), +3
70Ytterbium(+2), +3
71Lutetium+3
72Hafnium+4
73Tantalum(+3), (+4), +5
74Tungsten(+2), (+3), (+4), (+5), +6
75Rhenium(-1), (+1), +2, (+3), +4, (+5), +6, +7
76Osmium(+2), +3, +4, +6, +8
77Iridium(+1), (+2), +3, +4, +6
78Platinum(+1), +2, (+3), +4, +6
79Gold+1, (+2), +3
80Mercury+1, +2
81Thallium+1, (+2), +3
82Lead+2, +4
83Bismuth(-3), (+2), +3, (+4), (+5)
84Polonium(-2), +2, +4, (+6)
85Astatine?
86Radon0
87Francium?
88Radium+2
89Actinium+3
90Thorium+4
91Protactinium+5
92Uranium(+2), +3, +4, (+5), +6

Reference: Lange's Handbook of Chemistry, 8th Ed., Norbert A. Lange (Ed.), Handbook Publishers, Inc. 1952.

I can never forget this great man

While I was struggling to find out a method related to spectroscopic technique in Computational Chemistry, many Indian Scientists deliberately delayed disclosing the same for reasons better known to them. Quite reluctantly I just shot a mail to PvR Schleyer (on whose references I built up my PhD thesis) and wanted to forget the whole episode of requesting with our fellows. And to my surprise, I got a reply from him in minutes!!! He did not know me, but for the sake of 'humanity', perhaps, he elaborated the technique with an example!

He has died a few days back, on 21st November, at his home in Ila, Georgia, US.

He has published 1271 papers and is the third most cited Chemist in the world of Modern day chemistry. Paul von Ragué Schleyer, 84, a towering figure in physical organic chemistry and a chemistry professor at the University of Georgia, in Athens is no more.

Delving into a broad range of physical organic, organo-metallic, inorganic, and theoretical chemistry topics, Schleyer made vast contributions, including discovering ways of synthesizing adamantane and other cage molecules by rearrangement. He also identified new types of hydrogen bonding, elucidated solvolysis mechanisms, and expounded on the nature of reactive intermediates.

Schleyer discovered new molecular structures, particularly those involving lithium and electron-deficient systems. Most recently, he focused on nuclear magnetic resonance, aromaticity, and planar hypercoordination of carbon and other elements.

His home page: http://schleyer.chem.uga.edu/ 

You are here - Chris Hadfield - Review



Around the world in 92 Minutes!

We have read "Around the world in 80 days", and at first this title appeared a sequel to that. But it is not so. The vintage book is about sea voyage and has many fictitious characters and incidents.

This one is real. Hadfield has done extensive research after taking about 45000 pictures from the ISS and has chosen only the best and intriguing ones. The book is very simple and dwells on the nature of the Earth's structure and has many historical references as well.

The book shows our home, our city, country, continent, our whole planet - from a unique perspective. It was actually Chris's Twitter feed from the ISS. This photo documentary shows us we didn't really understand what we saw from his tweets. We caught the beauty but missed the meaning. Curated from images never before shared, Chris's big picture reveals why our planet looks the way it does and why we live where we do. Chris sees more in these images than we do, not just because he's spent months in space but because his in-depth knowledge of geology, geography and meteorology allows him to read the mysteries the photos reveal.  His most beautiful explanation I liked was over the eye of the Sahara Desert - The Richat Structure in Mauritiana.

Present tweets from Alexander Gerst and Reid Wiseman (returned 10th Nov, 2014) also conform to this fact, but Hadfield has made a mark.

If you want to see how the world really looks like from a height of about 450 Km, and appreciate the art work of our Creator, then this book is for you. Enjoyed every photo and the fascinating commentary.

You Are Here: Around the World in 92 Minutes: Chris Hadfield, Random House Canada

Brilliant Blunders - Mario Livio - Review

Mistakes are portals of Discovery! Review

Mario Livio explores some of the most brilliant blunders in the history of science, but with a pinch of excessive elaboration, at least for those who are already aware of Darwin's ignorance of Mendel and Einstein's utterance about cosmological Constant.

While there are no shortage of legitimate mistakes in science , Livio focuses instead on what a handful of high-order blunders. The following are the main blunders that form the crux of this book:

1. Charles Darwin's theory of evolution conflicted with the understanding of heredity in his day: In the mid-1800's, before Mendel's experiments showed how heredity worked, scientists (including Darwin himself) believed that heredity worked by combining traits. So, for example, if you had a white moth and a black moth, if they mated then this would result in a gray moth. Unfortunately, this sort of heredity doesn't actually provide an environment in which his theory of evolution can really work, because any benefits from natural selection would eventually fade away in the background of the population.

2. Lord Kelvin's estimate of the age of the Earth: Using basic principles from physics and thermodynamics, Lord Kelvin estimated the length of time it would take for the newly-formed hot Earth to cool down into the temperature it is today. This theory assumed that there was no convection beneath the Earth's crust. His blunder is that when this was pointed out, he refused to even realistically consider that a fluid, melted core was a possibility! His prediction was drastic.

3. Linus Pauling almost discovered the double helix structure of DNA, but made a basic chemistry mistake in the model: The resulting model - created in haste in an effort to pre-empt publication by others. When Watson & Crick saw the flawed model, they rushed to get their model completed in time to beat Pauling to publication!

4. Fred Hoyle refused to abandon his steady state theory well after there was sufficient evidence to refute it: In an effort to avoid an origin predicted by the big bang theory, Fred Hoyle suggested a process of continual matter creation throughout the universe, called the steady state theory. The theory itself was perfectly reasonable when proposed, but as evidence mounted against it (such as the discovery of the cosmic microwave background radiation), Hoyle refused to acknowledge that his theory might be wrong and kept adjusting the theory in attempts to keep it viable.

5. Albert Einstein's introduction of the cosmological constant into general relativity: One of the first solutions to Einstein's equations of general relativity showed that it allowed for a universe that was expanding or contracting. To fit with his ideal of a static universe, Einstein introduced a term into the equation (allowed but not required by theoretical considerations) which kept the universe constant, neither expanding nor contracting. However, when Edwin Hubble discovered evidence that the universe was expanding, Einstein no longer saw it as necessary, so set the cosmological constant to 0. In 1998, evidence arose which suggested that some mysterious dark energy is causing the universe to expand, meaning that Einstein's cosmological constant may actually have a non-zero value anyway ... something that several of Einstein's peers suggested at the time. Livio also spends considerable time describing his investigation into the claim that Einstein called the introduction of the cosmological constant his "biggest blunder" ... and finds it wanting.

The book is a good narrative of these key moments in the development of science. The different blunders reveal the way science progressed and evolved.

The first part of the book, on Darwin's blunder is a bit too involved with genetics and forces a dry discussion. You must keep interest in the 'blunders' so that you pass through Kelvin's and finally reach Einstein. The later part of the book is interesting relatively and the best thing I found in this book is the 'Reference' the author has covered - a whopping >20% of the book itself!!

Hyperspace: A Scientific Odyssey Through Parallel Universes, Time Warps, and the 10th Dimension - Michiu Kaku - Review



Written in a simple manner Kaku takes us on a journey from finite to infinite with reasons. The entry into dimensions 1,2,3,4....10 is very lucid and with several proofs he makes us believe that there may be more dimensions we might 'think', particularly about light which has many peculiar properties (including the fastest wave) as a fall out of interacting dimensions. He reasons it with a fact that the electromagnetic radiations are every where and such a huge amount of radiation cannot exist without its own 'space'. We just do not have the 'equipment' to see these dimensions.

The talk of Mobius strip and Flatland (a book by Abbott E Abbott is referred) caught my attention. If we were in 2D only we would see only shadows.Nice. If you lived in a flatland and were folded into a Mobius strip and made to traverse you would probably see your heart moved from left side of the chest to right!

The matrix to describe super symmetry using Einstein, Maxwell and Yang-Mill is excellent (Gravity and light, Nuclear Force and Matter), the result of which could be leptons and muons. (just like bosons and fermions)

The importance of geometry is laid like this
Geometry —> field theory —> classical theory —> quantum theory
So, he seems to suggest we 'cook' up all the geometries of the molecules and materials and have enough evidence for such support using quantum theory, the development of which alone is the basis of all advanced materials science.

He pays rich tribute to many forgotten scientists and also mentions Srinvasan Ramanujan as to have come across some strange parameters amounting to 10 numbers which if assigned 10 dimensions could well solve the problem he proposed (Number Theory), using present day super computers.

The book can be sensed in two parts
First half of the book is the history of hyperspace, second half is what can come out of the theory and is a little bit uninteresting wherein Kaku expresses Sociology and Civilization along with COBE, Wormholes, Dimensions and Mathematics Time machine and blue print for it. A few good anecdotes like this one from Aquinas about Creator is catching:

Things are in motion, hence there is a first mover
Things are caused, hence there is a first cause
Things exist, hence there is a creator
Perfect goodness exists, hence it has a source
Things are designed, hence they serve a purpose

A good book for science lovers and even those who think they have no good science background can find this book interesting.

Kepler’s second law holds that a line segment connecting an orbiting planet to its sun sweeps out equal areas in equal periods of time: In the diagram above, if the time intervals t are equal, then so are the areas A.

If gravity were turned off, would this still be true?


(Below Picture) Yes. The planet would pass into space in a straight line, and each time interval would define a triangle with height h and base t. Since a triangle’s area is half the product of its height and base, they’re all equal.

Why Does the World Exist : Jim Holt - Review



The central theme of the book being "Why is there something rather than nothing", made an attractive start up. The author has interviewed about 50-60 illustrious personalities like John Updike, David Deutsch, Adolf Grünbaum, John Leslie, Derek Parfit, Roger Penrose, Richard Swinburne and Steven Weinberg (has missed mentioning Abuds Salam for the theory both were credited). A few have taken the question seriously and a few sarcastically. The answers are not objective and have run into descriptive pages which are interesting. After a few chapters (like 5 or 6 out of 25), the interest wanes as some philosophical points diffuses into unnecessarily drifted topics (away from the central theme). There is mention about Buddha, Imam Ghazali and the 'invention of zero' by 'Hindu' as Shunya.  Platonic World and Multiverse are a few new things I learnt here. 

A few 'questions' have been the answer for his questions; for the Big Bang : What banged? and Why did it Bang? What is Life without numbers? Where do all roads lead to? "What is it that breathes fire into equations and makes a universe for them to describe?  Why does the universe go through all the bother of existing?" etc.

For those who would like to go in search of understanding Universe (and no one has so far understood), this book may prove to be an ontological sojourn of refreshment for brain. Quite a few books have come out good on theory of Universal existence, but no one has ever touched on the topic "mother". His narration of how he sees his mother facing cancer and later death makes an interesting reading. Her mother had even won a local Tennis tournament a few years before her death and his love for the mother is reflective in his last part of the book where he does not say she died, but was transferred!

#The_Singularity_is_Nearer: When we merge with AI - Ray_Kurzweil - #Review

    The book starts with “where we stand” in terms of epochs with the present one being a merger of bio-science with technology. The idea th...