Pages

Monday, July 31, 2023

#Life 3.0: Being human in the age of AI - Max Tegmark - Review


    For the first time I came across a book where the author tries to coerce us to read the 'prelude', which, of course, I did and later found that it was only a cold-war-era type introduction to a clandestine group that forms the dark side of the internet- and that controls the artificial 'statistical' intelligence. This, the author asks while I was fast reading the second chapter. The Omega and Prometheus are probably the fictional entities that rule the internet and thus have scores of information and data that could be used constructively or otherwise.

Written in an accessible and engaging style- and at times tedious- the book is aimed at the general public and offers a political and philosophical map of the promises and perils of the AI revolution. Instead of pushing any one agenda or prediction, Tegmark seeks to cover as much ground as possible - as you would read here, reviewing a wide variety of scenarios concerning the impact of AI on the job market, warfare, and political systems.

However, Life 3.0 does a good job of clarifying basic terms and key debates (with enough references), and in dispelling common myths. While science fiction has caused many people to worry about evil robots, for instance, the author rightly emphasizes that the real problem is the unforeseen consequences of developing highly competent AI. Artificial intelligence need not be evil and need not be encased in a robotic frame in order to wreak havoc. In Tegmark’s words, “The real risk with artificial general intelligence isn’t malice but competence. A super-intelligent AI will be extremely good at accomplishing its goals, and if those goals aren’t aligned with ours, we’re in trouble.”

            On the easier side, instead of diving deep into ethical issues and valid concerns around AI, he speculates on different scenarios in great detail. So much so that at times we would think that this is a purely fictional work.  He goes into endless speculations of how AI might go wrong in multiple ways and takes the obvious joy of making those as detailed and long.  And then he would suddenly talk about the existing computers and their accomplishments with the aid of Physics and Biology. 

    To give an example of how preposterous his scenarios are he claims the advanced AI will need a lot of energy that would be hard to fulfill (about half an mg of matter to empower the 13W brain) and also that once we are able to build mega architectural structures we could tap into the energy of a black hole to provide the necessary power to get along Life 3.0 (AI revolution). Of course, Life 1.0 is pure bacterial and animal evolution while Life 2.0 is cultural evolution as a result of human beings. The Pandemic was secretly targeted to ensure that nobody who knew anything about Science and Technology survived.

Here are some highlights in the order of the book:

Tiruchirappalli gets a mention as a place for fake suppliers of 'orders' based on AI by the ghost Omega.

That the DNA can store 1GB of energy and not beyond is a topic to ponder upon.

Intelligence is the ability to accomplish goals. John McCarthy coined the word Artificial Intelligence. Natural language translation using AI would be very easy in the future. There is a lot of detail into how memory works and the description of AND and NAND gates take an entire chapter.

    There is a description of the Ariane 5 rocket of the ESA which exploded 37 seconds after its launch due mainly to intelligence failure and was mainly a buggy software manipulating a number too large to fit into 16-bit allocation. The same kind of thing occurred with NASA's Mars climate orbiter - the difference in units caused a 445% error. Another of its Mariner spacecraft malfunctioned due to an incorrect punctuating mark and a Hyphen caused end of shutting down the mission to Phobos.

Robotic surgery accidents were linked to 144 death and 1391 injuries in the US during 2000-2013 and AI drones can kill accurately. Was that catching?

A chapter endorsing fears talks about AI generating fake realistic videos which could help the government and pose dangers of misuse by miscreants. An instance quoted was the failure of a guided missile system that killed 290 people in a Gulf war.  Just as chemists and biologists have no interest in chemical and biological weapons AI researchers also have no interest in building AI weapons.

Work keeps at bay three evils; Boredom, Vice, and need - Voltaire

An intelligence explosion is expected just like an explosion reaction that can occur due to chain reaction as depicted in Nuclear Science. Game Theory and Nash equilibrium find mention.

Freeman Dyson gets almost a chapter. His sphere the size of Earth's orbit would give us about 500 million times more surface area to live on!

The efficiency values given in Table 6.1 is nice and a few are mentioned below:

  • 1.     Digesting a candy bar is 0.00000001%
  • 2.     Burning Coal is 0.00000003%
  • 3.     Burning gasoline is 0.00000005&
  • 4.     Fission of Uranium is 0.08%
  • 5.     Black hole evaporation is 90%

Galaxies, ET life, and Inorganic intelligence are cited in an elaborate manner in a chapter. Chandrasekar limit which says any mass 1.4 times greater than the sun would explode supports all the explosions observed by present-day telescopes using AI.  Big Crunch is also obvious. For the Big Crunch to occur a rubber band is equated that can burst with over expansion.

Goals: If we cede control to machines that don’t share our goals then we are like to get what we don’t want. Pursue goals instead of following rule of the thumb. That reality is relative and more so because visual experience can’t reside in the retina.

Brain rebels against its genes to become a monk or nun. To gain weight we carve to have more sweets. It is a kind of hacking. The ultimate goals of the system can be independent of intelligence and Consciousness is subjective experience. Water is wet but ice and steam are not - arrangement governs the emergent phenomenon

If it is falsifiable it is not scientific - karl Pepper

The last chapter about AI ethics and principles would make an interesting reading if only the reader is truly connected with AI and the photos pertaining to these meetings and conferences of all the scholars involved make a banging end.

 

#The_Laws_of_Human_Nature by Robert Greene - Review

       This is another book that I would classify under the 'fast-read' category because of its narration about human tendencies rat...